10 Feb
2004
10 Feb
'04
5:57 a.m.
At Monday 2004-02-09 15:30, you wrote:
David Abrahams wrote: [...]
thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?
I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the joining thread is totally wrong and insensible.
would you rather abort the application??
regards, alexander.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"