David Abrahams wrote:
"Daniel James" <daniel@calamity.org.uk> writes:
On 2/19/06, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Daniel James <daniel@calamity.org.uk> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Why is hashing located under functional? The functional library is deprecated, IIRC.
Because it's based on the TR1 hash functions, which are in <functional>.
Hm. I'm not sure if that's a good enough reason. Or maybe we should get the other stuff that's in there out of that directory.
Well, I don't really mind where it goes, I'll happily follow the consensus.
I guess as long as functional.hpp isn't deprecated, it's fine where it is. But I like the idea that things built specifically for tr1 compatibility should go in boost/tr1/...
boost/hash/ will do fine. <waves hand>