16 Jan
2012
16 Jan
'12
12:30 a.m.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:53:24 -0800, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
During Boost.Local review, it was proposed to move the overload template out of Local and in Boost.Functional. What would the best name for it?
1) boost::overload_function (my preference) 2) boost::overloaded_function 3) boost::function_overload 4) boost::functional::overload (Boost.Functional seems to use boost:: directly and not boost::functional-- to mimic C++11 <functional>).
What about boost::multi_function?