23 Nov
2008
23 Nov
'08
3:02 p.m.
on Sun Nov 23 2008, "Daniel James" <daniel_james-AT-fmail.co.uk> wrote:
2008/11/23 Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle@morganstanley.com>:
Hence we need two different implementations. That is exactly what I proposed.
There's no reason that they both have to be in boost. Boost range should let you use your own range class.
That is another option. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com