9 Jun
2009
9 Jun
'09
11:44 a.m.
Daniel James skrev:
2009/6/9 Christian Schladetsch <christian.schladetsch@gmail.com>:
This thread suggests that a DirectX wrapper
would be rejected.
I have gone to great lengths to make clear that I am not proposing a "DirectX wrapper".
Providing systems that support DirectX development is a different thing to making a system that wraps DirectX.
OK. This thread suggests that a 'system that supports DirectX development' would be rejected.
Why? How many of those with negative comments are actually using direct x? I personally think it would be a ice addition to boost, if it adds true value. -Thorsten