Over at boost.org there's a page for Boost.Build, at: http://www.boost.org/tools/build/v2/index.html the content of which is exactly what was in the last Boost release. There's another page for Boost.Build, namely http://boost.org/boost-build2, content of which is regenerated nightly, using SVN state. The first page, generally, is outdated and wrong. For example, now it points a Milestone 11 downloads while current version of Boost.Build is M12, talks about CVS (and links to a page that does not say how to get anything from either CVS or SVN), points to development roadmap that is totally inaccurate, and so on. Generally, both the download and documentation links at http://boost.org/boost-build2 will yield better results to a user. Are there any objections to making the up-to-date docs page the one most easily found, and making docs corresponding to the last release only found via some "doc archive", or not accessible at all? (Rene's working on new website, so how this is implemented technically is separate question, I'm asking only about user-visible effect). - Volodya