
6 Aug
2011
6 Aug
'11
6 p.m.
On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Ion GaztaƱaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
The problem is that flat_xxx take advantage of already implemented move semantics (insertions, etc.) from ::boost::container::vector. stable_vector has the same interface so it would be easy. The problem is to define the Concept (in post C++0x terms) flat_xxx::implementation should be based on.
I guess the obvious question is, does a vanilla c++0x vector fit the bill, and if not, what's missing?