18 Jul
2005
18 Jul
'05
11:42 p.m.
"Peter Simons" wrote:
Others have expressed (perhaps not publicly) that their preferred method would be that secondary destructions are simply no-ops, rather than being errors or asserting at all. Such conflicting interests make it seem like a policy is indeed necessary.
Well, having a policy mechanism won't hurt. I'm all for it. ;-)
Adding one more policy reduces number of people who will use a template. This is equivalent of adding one more parameter to a function and seeing people writing their own homemade version. /Pavel