Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:

Okay, point taken. But that's *not* BOOST_MPL_ASSERT. IMO you need a different macro for that purpose.

I agree. I will be creating new macros for my purposes. They will likely

conditionally forward to the BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_* macros, since they produce the most informative output when a compile error is desired. Thank you, Ben Robinson, Ph.D.

-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost