Thomas Witt wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
Wow, that's a little scary. Was that someone who's generally on the ball, or one of those very few who sometimes vociferously object to what's being proposed on the grounds that it doesn't do the very thing it actually does?
I don't like the direction this is going in. Let's just say that my presentation of optional was not detailed enough for people not familiar with the concept. Mea culpa.
Don't blame it on your self ;) You've done an excelent job as shown by the results (the proposal moving forward). Thank you! This is a long standing issue, the interface I proposed was from the beggining loved and hated... and it will keep being like that even if I manage to convince most members that is a good idea. Best -- Fernando Cacciola SciSoft http://fcacciola.50webs.com/