20 Mar
2007
20 Mar
'07
1:48 a.m.
On 3/19/07, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
on Mon Mar 19 2007, "Jeremy Pack" <rostovpack-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
My primary goal here is to avoid creating a "framework". I don't want to require the user to change the structure of their program in order to use this functionality - it should easily fit into existing programs.
I don't think "non-intrusive framework" is an oxymoron.
I suppose I overgeneralized! Sorry about that - I use and build frameworks myself. I just felt that in a library, especially one designed for Boost, it would be better to make it as flexible as possible.