23 Nov
2009
23 Nov
'09
2:24 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> wrote:
Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> writes:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Vicente Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if I have already requested that but ...
Is there any deep reason to don't provide the equivalent of the free functions lock, try_lock
Sorry everyone, I misunderstood the question. I thought *none* of these functions existed, and was asking why. It's nice to see that there is a deadlock-avoiding lock-multiple (as long as it is used consistently!) Tony