4 Mar
2014
4 Mar
'14
8:42 p.m.
Niall Douglas wrote:
I will say this though: there is a whole ton of incentive for clang to become perfectly substitutable for MSVC.
There probably is, which is why we have a 3/4-broken clang-cl instead of a fully working clang-mingw32 (which would have taken a lot less of effort). That's unfortunate, at least for me. I have no immediate or critical need for a perfect substitute for MSVC - we already have two of those. I need Clang on Windows so that I can test for portability and Clang-specific issues.