Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
Le 10/11/11 21:13, Gennadiy Rozental a écrit :
Steven Watanabe<watanabesj<at> gmail.com> writes:
Looks like -std=c++0x is being specified when it shouldn't for some reason? Is something broken, or am i imagining it?
This is a problem in Boost.Test as of r75372. How should I specify in Jamfile that I want to require c++11 support from gcc starting with version a.b.c?
You should not require this. Even if using a given version of gcc, users could been to preserve a C++03 behavior.
What is the problem with enabling C++11 features if possible? We do not expect backward compatibility issues, don't we? What about MSVC? It has C++11 enabled by default. Some of the new features of Boost.Test require c++11 support. I want to be able to test it and I want users to be able to use it. Gennadiy