14 Apr
2006
14 Apr
'06
7 a.m.
"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Looking at the end result, I can't say I think fop-0.91beta is an improvement. :-P Unless you *really* need to embed png files, I say stick with fop-0.20.X.
I expect that output is somewhat tunable. Is it just OOTB formatting that you think is no improvement, or does it look like there are more fundamental issues here? Care to post two PDFs for side-by-side comparison? Thanks, -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com