29 Sep
2005
29 Sep
'05
2:55 p.m.
Andy Little wrote:
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote
Failing that, anybody has any killer idea for GUI development that warrants new library? Why don't add Qt to the C++ standard?
That's not really relevant in two areas: For developers: 1. For open-source applications, there's GPL version, costing exactly $0 2. Do you really want to write a new GUI library just to help commercial companies? For standartisation: That's price of Qt *library*, for commercial use. But: - Standard specifies only interface, and does not mandate specific source code or vendor. - Why do you think any implementation of standard library should be free of charge? - Volodya