"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> writes:
"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message
Surely you grabbed most of your code out of Boost.Python (?)
I did not grap the code I just followed the discussion we had at the time.
Okay.
Anyway, the point of my exercise was to extract the mechanism into an easy-to-use general-purpose library with as little overhead as possible (e.g. no dynamic allocations are forced). If we still think there's a point in having such a general library (at least in detail), your particular interface choices could be implemented on top of it.
I wil need to look in more detailes. I could be not trivial. Also I couldn't afford all the dependencies you introduced.
?? I was very careful to avoid dependencies. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com