14 May
2011
14 May
'11
1:14 a.m.
On 2011.05.13_17.55.50, Steven Watanabe wrote:
Why do you expect this to work? range_size doesn't support references at all. Ah, I didn't realize range_size doesn't support references at all. In that case, why not add those specializations, as well?
Why should a reference to an array be special?
Why should an array be special? If the metafunction is defined for a particular type, and a logical definition exists for the qualified forms of said type, then the metafunction should work for the qualified forms, IMHO.
Doesn't range_size<char const[5]> work?
It works, but char const[5] is not char const (&)[5]. Thanks Steven. -- Bryce Lelbach aka wash boost-spirit.com px.cct.lsu.edu github.com/lll-project