Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators

AMDG David Abrahams wrote:

...

Using Arno's suggestion, dereferencing the end iterator ought to throw, which happens before we increment off the end, right?

The *underlying* iterator? How are you going to get that to throw if it's a pointer?

You would have to wrap it. Any solution using iterators adapters is going to have to rely on detecting whether an iterator knows it's own end. In Christ, Steven Watanabe