On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
on Mon Dec 17 2012, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard-AT-ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 17/12/12 23:03, Robert Ramey wrote:
Hmmmm - I've always thought Trac was great. It has some minor annoyances - it slows down, but in general I think its just great from a user(me) point of view.
I was thinking it could be a good idea to let maintainers use the tool they're most comfortable with, but then lack of consistency might be disconcerting to external users.
Maybe. Regardless, I request that we take up the topic of bug tracking systems after the transition to Git is complete.
+1e10
Strong agreement. The release managers have to get a new Git-based release system working, and are also deeply involved in getting Git-based testing working. Not to mention the Git and Modular Boost conversion itself. We need to get all that under our belt before worrying about the svn trac. --Beman