Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> writes:
- mutable iterators must be defined as a specialization of boost::range_mutable_iterator
What do you mean? Surely not _all_ mutable iterators. I assume the library doesn't magically make char* an invalid mutable iterator?
Now the library does not treat char* as a Range anymore.
I know that, but I don't see the relevance. AFAICT your statement was not about what qualifies as a Range but about mutable iterators.
right, range_iterator is now range_mutable_iterator and range_result_iterator is now range_iterator.
I know that, but I don't see the relevance. AFAICT your statement was not about how to ask for a Range's iterator types but about about mutable iterators being specializations of some particular class template. I still don't understand what that statement meant. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com