Re: [boost] [gsoc2017]Satyam Pandey Copy GSoC 2017 Proposal writen by Ruoyun Jing

*NO ! I REJECT !* *Plagiarism is plagiarism!* 2017-04-03 19:04 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey :

Sorry for using such harsh words earlier. I'm little frustrated now, I really want to work in this project and I did not start earlier so , I have to complete everything in a hurry. As yours and mine background was very similar (professionally (i.e we do competitive and all)). I used your proposal as a reference for preparing mine. I would have really thanked you if you would have helped me to make my proposal better as anyhow we are working on different projects, so it does not matter even if our proposal have some similarity. We could have helped each other rather than making all this mess.

Thanks Satyam Pandey

On Apr 3, 2017 3:37 PM, "Ruoyun Jing via Boost" wrote:

Hi Boost, Vissarion, Adam, Niall, David

Sorry for disturbing you at this time, I experienced a very bad thing that Satyam Pandey, a student who sent proposal yesterday copied too many sections of my proposal. I marked the sections red in the given PDF.* I think the same pattern of GSoC proposal is common, and it does not matter, but his proposal has too many same description as me. *

And I received two emails from google docs. I will transmit these two emails in the following emailsThe meaning of one email is Satyam Pandey do a replace:replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+”

The meaning of another email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…” to“`+”

I sent an email to him, but he did not think he did the copy work. But the actually thing is* he forked the whole proposal and then change some words to fix his condition.*

2017-04-03 7:42 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey :

...

Hello Ruyong, I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it calmly and would try to understand.

1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs . So I used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal.

1. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are the things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves maths and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not faking my interest toward them as you can check by following the links that I have given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you want to say no-one other than you can like both. 2. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make sense for me,cause we are applying for different Projects. 3. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you start describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it in your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function which is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , have we both copied from google ??

I do not think this means reference, he just use my discription directly and change some similar words.* This means COPY. *

...

And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns the whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, before creating this nuisance. Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because borrowing ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.

I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes

*I do not accept his apologize. I want to be given impartial judgement for this disgusting COPY.*

Thanks all for reading.:)

Best regards.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost

-- Northwest University of China Software Engineering jingry0321@gmail.com