10 May
2005
10 May
'05
5:21 p.m.
"Rob Stewart" wrote:
1. Creator policy is redundant with the standard Allocator concept, I think. Though the standard Allocator concept has some subtle, tricky semantics, I think it's nevertheless worth using: that would permit interoperability with existing allocator implementations.
Thinking it again: you are likely right here.
Handling of constructor arguments could be separated from allocation.
I don't know about that, but perhaps an adapter could be provided to make a standard allocator look like a creator?
I should be possible w/o adapter. Just expecting std::allocator like parameter in template. /Pavel