On 9/5/2012 12:05 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
On 9/5/12 11:12 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel, I know you're annoyed by this change. But in truth, you were relying on an implementation detail of result_of. The list of gotchas in the release notes will include this case.
I am not in anyway annoyed. I am just pointing out the problems of result_of in real code. You keep in saying "you". In fact, it's not me. That part of the code is Tobias'; The phoenix-3 code using result_of is Thomas', keep in mind that Phoenix-2 uses its own result protocol.
My apologies. In any case, I've described the problem along with a potential fix to the standardization committee, and cc'ed Doug. I'll be interested in hearing what they say. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com