Doug Gregor wrote:
Meanwhile I am very much puzzled with the inconsistency of rather high download activity and relatively low amount of feedback the Typeof library has received on the list. If somebody could offer a reasonable explanation of this fact, it would help us a lot in our future work with boost.
I think Jody is right on. I know that I really wanted to review the typeof library, but the upcoming release has sucked up what little time I've been able to spare for Boost. More time for reviews may be the answer.
Same here. I really wanted to do a review but I got neck deep on other activities. I'm very interested with the typeof library from the very start. Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net