25 Oct
2024
25 Oct
'24
2:03 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 6:04 AM Dominique Devienne via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
...I was surprised when Vinnie didn't jump on this,
I think Boost is better off with async-mqtt5 than without it. In theory, splitting a library up into a protocol library and an I/O library is better engineering. However in the case of the MQTT protocol the heavy lifting is by far in the I/O code with its retries and strategies for implementing the QoS. And a review should evaluate the library we have, not the library that we think it should be. Thanks