Robert Ramey wrote:
I originally spawned this thread with an observation regarding what I felt was inappropriate usage of boost logo. That WAS you, wasn't it:) See what you stirred up? <grin;> One can use any other logo he wants for any purpose he wants as far as I'm concerned. After all, it's still a free country. My only suggestion is that boost.org copyright the boost logo - ( Last time I looked - this cost $25 - its probably more now) and create a policy for it's usage.
Is it like a written work which is copyright upon creation with registering only of use if the ownership might come into doubt? If so, then I wouldn't see the need because boost has demonstrated ownership publicly.
That would satisfy my concerns and I don't think we or anyone else has the authority to enforce some other logo on anyone else.
+1 Patrick