Re: [boost] QVM Review

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Rainer Deyke wrote:

...

On 16.12.2015 22:21, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

...

The swizzling syntax must be terse or else it's useless. If you've written shader code you'll know utterly inadequate it is to require a syntax like swizzle<1,0,3,2>(vec) instead of (vec,YXWZ). At any rate, swizzling is defined in a separate header, don't include it if you don't want it.

YXWZ(vec) is not only much more readable than (vec,YXWZ), it's also one character shorter.

It's less conventional, in GLSL you just use vec.yxwz, and (vec,YXWZ) is quite close.

Also, let's say you want to access the X coordinate of a vector, (vec,X) is more readable than X(vec).

I do appreciate the concerns about overloading operator comma, I was also skeptical since this wasn't my idea. FWIW after years of use in actual development this overload hasn't caused any problems.

That said, I'm fine with using a different notation for swizzling.

IIRC the conclusion in SG14 was that swizzling is uncommon enough in regular programming to not warrant out-of-the-way special operators. In that most cases of its use are in shader languages and not in C++ itself. Did you consider the the array op: vec[X], vec[YXWZ]? It has the properties of both you and Rainer's ideas. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail