2009/9/25 Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com>:
Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
Ahh, where are the refs to the newly named _add & _subtract private methods?
do you mean refs in the docs or refs in the code?
I mean refs in the code. All I did to get to compile with only the header include was to rename the private declaration and definition of _add and _subtract. I didn't change any calls to these private methods, I wasn't sure which to the non-underline-prefixed calls should really be calling the _add/_subtract.
I thought you'd update the code from the boost sandbox ... wouldn't that be easier? Here are the applications of _add and _subtract member function templates. I am afraid though that those corrections won't help with the ambiguous partial spec problem applying operator += HTH Joachim --------------- the line numbers might be changed slightly. itl\interval_base_map.hpp(964): section.that()->template _add<codomain_intersect>(value_type(common_interval, sectant.second)) itl\interval_base_map.hpp(974): section.that()->template _add<codomain_combine>(value_type(common_interval, sectant.second)); itl\interval_base_map.hpp(1474): object.template _add<inplace_max>(*elem_); itl\map.hpp(242): return _add<codomain_combine>(value_pair); itl\map.hpp(249): return _add<codomain_combine>(prior, value_pair); itl\map.hpp(257): this->template _add<inverse_codomain_combine>(value_pair); itl\map.hpp(259): this->template _subtract<inverse_codomain_combine>(value_pair); itl\map.hpp(523): section.template _add<codomain_intersect>(sectant); itl\map.hpp(525): section.template _add<codomain_combine>(sectant); itl\map.hpp(573): section.template _add<codomain_intersect>(*sec_); itl\map.hpp(575): section.template _add<codomain_combine>(*sec_);