"Peder Holt" <peder.holt@gmail.com> wrote
I have implemented typeof for compilers not supporting partial specialization.
Before taking a closer look at your code, I assume that the only way to emulate partial template specialization is by employing template function overloading (I've done it once in the past)... If this is what you did, I wonder if base-derived classes are handled correctly...
The max depth of an expression increased from the mpl limit of 60 to the preprocessor limit of 256
Is this a real limit in MPL? I've always gotten 50, but I assumed it should be easy to lift... Seems unreasonably low... Can MPL experts comment on this?
template expressions containing integral values are allowed
The template: template<typename T,unsigned long V> struct X {}; can be exposed to typeof in the following way: BOOST_TYPEOF_DEFINE_TEMPLATE(X,2,(typename,unsigned long))
This is cool, I will definitely try to implement something similar.
(VC 7.1 had some problems preprocessing the code needed to make this work.)
This will have to be solved, though, I believe this compiler deserves not to be overlooked :) Regards, Arkadiy