Re: [boost] [flyweight] Review period extended to February 3

----- Mensaje original ----- De: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> Fecha: Sábado, Febrero 2, 2008 0:24 am Asunto: Re: [boost] [flyweight] Review period extended to February 3 Para: boost@lists.boost.org

Hello Steven,

...

"Steven Watanabe" wrotes

...

vicente.botet wrote:

...

So at the end there will be two holders: . intramodule_holder (renaming of static_holder) and . intermodule_holder

Those names are much too similar.

You are right. Maybe module_holder and process_holder?

I don't see any problem with static_holder, but if we don't want to stress the internal mechanism on which it is based maybe we can name it simple_holder, so we'd have simple_holder and intermodule_holder? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo