Re: [boost] [next gen future-promise] Whattocallthemonadicreturntype?

On 26 May 2015 3:54 pm, "Peter Dimov"  wrote:
>
> Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
>>
>> > Can it be generic? Do you have a generic implementation of when_any?
>>
>> You do need to standardise a generic asynchronous wait protocol of
course.
>
>
> Or, I can make promises shared as well, and then use .then.
>

Yeah 'then' itself works fine as a wait protocol although I prefer
something a bit lower level and dismissible (a 'cancel_then').

> when_any( f1, f2, f3 )
> {
>    future f;
>    promise p(f);
>
>    f1.then( [p](auto){ p.set_value(0); } );
>    f2.then( [p](auto){ p.set_value(1); } );
>    f3.then( [p](auto){ p.set_value(2); } );
>
>    return f.then( []( future index )
>    {
>        return make_pair(index.get(), make_tuple(f1, f2, f3));
>    });
> }
>
> Something like that.
>
> (I still don't need a mutex for the multiple set_value calls, by the way
- if(rn_++ == 0) { set the value; publish/notify; }.)
>