On Saturday 01 May 2004 11:45 am, Douglas Gregor wrote:
I think I have some free time as well... I'll need to get reacquainted with the existing result_of code (in the sandbox) before I know what to ask for.
It looks like the result_of implementation is in pretty good shape. I've expanded/fixed it to deal with a few cases I'd missed before. I'll check it in Two general issues remain: "support" for broken compilers and a matter of protocol. Broken compilers can't use result_of: without partial specialization, it's completely unusable. Also, compilers that don't support SFINAE can't detect result_type. I'm not sure how limiting this will be, but obvious Borland, HP, and pre-7.1 Microsoft are all toast. As for the protocol side of things: does anyone think we need to review a library that is (1) merely scaffolding for other libraries, (2) trivial, and (3) already blessed by the standards committee? Methinks not. Doug