Steven Watanabe wrote:
If it is possible to cleanly implement it as a separate library on top of Units then that would be my first choice.
I have also expressed an interest in actually doing this but there hasn't been much interest in making sure it actually works so I've trekked off on my own. From my perspective it seems like the goal is to fast track this static unit library into boost without first making sure people are going to use it, and second that they can. If the expectation is that people will build runtime unit systems on top of this then steps should be taken to make that possible, easy, and clean. However, when I brought this option up earlier it was deemed unimportant. That's fine, but I can't really support the library without this.