At 21:28 2005-08-12, you wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:07:38 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote
Jeff Garland writes:
Why are digital mars, como and other 'non-required' compilers in the regressions results page ( http://tinyurl.com/cdlxk )?
Because the release was tested on them and many people would like to see what's the status of these?
Shouldn't these be on the 'developer link' ?
I was expecting to see an all green condition
If you follow the "Release View" link at the top, you'll see the report showing only the status of the required toolsets.
I see -- I believe this is where the mainpage link should send 'users'.
and instead I see a bunch of failures we never really tried to resolve. I think we should remove these from the user pages....
On what basis?
It's just extra noise for most users -- not many people use dmc or tru64. And it could reduce their confidence in boost...
if we took out all the "expected failures" it would reduce their confidence in most compilers
Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"