14 Jan
2009
14 Jan
'09
12:26 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Robert Jones <robertgbjones@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
I've decided not to attempt support for Cygwin in the next version of Boost.Filesystem.
I don't entirely understand the implications of this. Without Boost.Filesystem, are we effectively saying that Boost as a whole non longer supports the predominant free C++ compiler, or is that a bit of an overstatement?
Excuse me, but MSVC is the predominant free C++ compiler on Windows. :) Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode