16 Nov
2012
16 Nov
'12
2:13 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 15/11/12 21:10, Darren Garvey wrote:
I agree. The top-level directory is overpopulated.
What's wrong with it? If it's going to be in the top-level boost namespace, it might as well be a top-level file too.
We are in process of modularizing boost libraries because lumping all of boost into a single repo, or tarball, or whatever doesn't scale. So think about the future - in a modularized boost where the top-level is really just references to libraries, what library does this belong in? --Beman