Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()

On May 19, 2014 11:26:49 AM EDT, Adam Wulkiewicz wrote:

...

Then probably also

boost::ignore_unused_variable(v1) ; boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);

for consistency.

Actually, I'd favor ignore_unused(). I see no reason for "variable" to be in the name. If you use a macro, then you'd need to distinguish between TYPEDEFs and VARIABLEs.

Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?

Glen's argument against config makes sense. Utility doesn't seem unreasonable. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)