28 Mar
2008
28 Mar
'08
9:04 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Very interesting. As far as use cases, one might take a look at extended_type_info in the serialization library. It seems related to this.
I don't see a connection between boost::variant and extended_type_info. Isn't extended_type_info designed to handle any type? This is unlike boost::variant, which is just a type-safe union. -- Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode