But, isn't this what you'd use an RPC framework for? So a user won't have to mess with the networking code?
For, instance XML-RPC. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML-RPC "XML-RPC" also refers generically to the use of XML for remote procedure call, independently of the specific protocol".
On Monday, May 18, 2015 8:30 AM, Andreas Schäfer
Programmer needs to implement serialization for custom data (as it is shown for struct ABC in https://github.com/amarmer/RemoteCall/blob/master/TestAPI.h )Then advantage of the framework: C++ remote programming model is the same as local.
I think there already are plenty of RPC frameworks which also carry this functionality. HPX[1] comes to mind (though it has to be noted that HPX does much more than just RPCs).
It can be any transport which synchronously sends and receives data,
From a user perspective, I have to say that a "synchronous-only" makes much sense for our applications.
it is not implemented by framework.
But, isn't this what you'd use an RPC framework for? So a user won't have to mess with the networking code? Cheers -Andreas [1] http://stellar-group.org/libraries/hpx/ -- ========================================================== Andreas Schäfer HPC and Grid Computing Department of Computer Science 3 Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany +49 9131 85-27910 PGP/GPG key via keyserver http://www.libgeodecomp.org ========================================================== (\___/) (+'.'+) (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination! _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost