[boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]

Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:

This change would also allow an action's context be to be the source state - or would there still be some problem with that? Does the context really have to be an outer state of the destination as well as the source?

To answer my own question - If transitions actually occur before destructors run as per my proposal, then the source state itself, and all its outer state contexts exist so the restriction of only common outer contexts being available is removed.