Re: [boost] [hash2][review] Early review (due to holidays)

Joaquín M López Muñoz wrote:

...

No dia 5 de dez. de 2024, às 12:52, Peter Dimov via Boost escreveu:

[…] And I don't want to force hash algorithm authors to have to include , because this would mean a physical dependency on Hash2. At the moment, you can define a hash algorithm without including anything from Hash2, or anything from Boost. And that's how it has to be.

You can define the interface of update as accepting a templatized arg with span-like semantics.

That's what I said in the part you omitted. I consider this a burden that I'd rather not impose on authors of hash algorithms.