Re: [boost] Interest in super string class?

4 Jul 2006

      Gennaro Prota wrote:
...
Hi Jeff,
just to be sure I understood: *the* two reasons for such a class are:
(a) helping novices (b) having a cleaner (whatever that means) syntax.
Sorry if I'm missing something or oversimplifying the issue. It seems
to me that (a) is a secondary point, as being a novice is something
deemed to disappear asap if you want to seriously program in C++; (b)
Well that's too bad indeed, but I think you're wrong on this.  For one thing, 
the committee is working changes for C++0x to fix long standing issues in C++ 
to eliminate common mistakes made by novices.  Even so, I don't care *that 
much* about novices.  I just want to be able to write code that *I* can 
understand when I read it 3 months later without rereading the string_algo and 
regex docs.
...
is very nicely obtained with Shunsuke's proposal, which seems to get
the best of the two worlds: power and syntactical convenience
I'm unconvinced from what I've seen so far.
...
(BTW, Shunsuke, is the code in the vault?).
Seems unlikely given that it's a 'future proposal'.  The only range algorithms 
stuff I know of in the vault was done by Eric N.
...
Other points?
Sure.  Here's a sanitized fragment of a pretty typical form for a perl script 
I've probably written 100 times:

open(IN, "<$filename") || die "File not found $filename\n";

$count = 0;
while ($line = <IN>) {
   chomp($line);
   count++;
   if ($line =~ /^\*\*\*/) {
     $line =~ s/^\*\*\*//;
     $line .= " line: " . $count;
     do_something1($line);
   } elsif ($line =~ /^\*\*/) {
     $line =~ s/^\*\*//;
      do_something($line);
   }
   #...lots more...
}

I believe I can trivially rewrite this using super_string in C++. Due to the 
extra escape the regex's are harder to understand, but with some comments it 
should be easier to see what is happening then the perl:

std::ifstream infile(...);
super_string line;

unsigned int count = 0;

while (infile.getline(line)) {
   count++;
   line.trim_right();
   if (line.contains_regex("^\\\*\\\*\\\*")) {
       line.replace_regex("^\\\*\\\*\\\*", "");
       line.append( " line: ").append(count);
       do_something(line);
    }
    else {...

I believe with some comments about what the regex's do, mere mortals (or Java 
programmers ;-) can read and understand this code.  Why should it be any other 
way?

Jeff

Re: [boost] Interest in super string class?

Jeff Garland