tom brinkman <reportbase@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
tom brinkman <reportbase@yahoo.com> writes:
With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be able to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per year.
I'm not sure we can handle faster growth than that. Should we be able to?
If we added 12 significant libraries in a given year, I'm sure most would consider that it had been a successful year.
I wonder if enough libraries are going through the preliminary submission/refinement phase outlined at http://www.boost.org/more/submission_process.htm#Preliminary
Many are not.
That's a problem. I remember the last time I tried to submit a library for formal review without doing that. Beman said, "aren't you forgetting something?" Checking that out should be a responsibility of the Review Wizard. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com