11 Nov
2006
11 Nov
'06
2:52 a.m.
Johan Paulsson <boost.org@kuodo.com> writes:
I wanted to show, as briefly as possible, the basic usage of my implementation compared to something the readers of this mailing list would recognize. I think it does. It was not my intention to prove one implementation better than the other, or provide a very useful test, and I think I never implied that.
I do think you implied your implementation was better. You seem to be concerned that you have offended somehow, but I have no problem with that implication at all. Your arguments didn't hold up for me, though.
Anyway, I am sorry you found it useless.
No need to apologize. Cheers, -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com