3 Jun
2007
3 Jun
'07
1:09 a.m.
Rene Rivera wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Douglas Gregor wrote:
|xpressive| test7: gcc-3.3.6_linux Huh, this test has been passing for ages and the code hasn't changed recently. Spurious failure?
Probably spurious. Marting has some random memory errors on the RAM of those machines, as in a single bit gets flipped with a low probability.
Then can I humbly suggest that Martin refrain from running any further tests on this machine until the memory problem is fixed? Wrong test results are worse then no results at all IMO, and will only slow us down. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com