Re: [boost] [compressed_pair] [hof] [hana] What's the story with compressed_pair?

Tom Westerhout wrote:

I would much prefer to use Boost.Utility's one, but unfortunately it's neither constexpr-friendly nor noexcept-friendly... Is there some reason why it cannot be annotated with macros which expand to constexpr and noexcept when compiled with C++11 support? Or has no one just gotten around to do it?

I suppose that no one has gotten around to do it. :-)