Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?

23 Jan 2009

      on Fri Jan 23 2009, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess-AT-nist.gov> wrote:
...
On Friday 23 January 2009 12:39 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
...
This can't really be minimal, can it?  Can you reduce it any further?
Ok, how about this version?
Better, thanks.  Well, several things are wrong here:

1. Our documentation should tell you to use value_type<...> instead of
   binding<...> for named template parameters

2. You should use value_type<...> instead of binding<...> for named
   template parameters ;-)

3. template_keyword's reference type should be value_type&.

Unfortunately, #3 will break legacy uses of binding for people that
followed our old instructions, so the real patch is attached:

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com