1 May
2008
1 May
'08
3:03 p.m.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:59 AM, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
[snip]
Long ago we decided to discourage it, but not to simply ban it, because *sometimes*, in rare instances, HTML provides the extra expressiveness needed to get a point across. It hasn't been a huge problem, AFAIK.
Some messages do bother to the point that I just give up reading them. But it is usually rare, but so are HTML messages in the list.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://boost-consulting.com
Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida