9 Feb
2018
9 Feb
'18
9:45 a.m.
On 02/09/18 12:13, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
wrote: * is there any better option? All the other options I see are even worse.
Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these issues?
What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03 compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?